
The title is a paraphrasing of that phrase the Occupy crowd loves to
chant to the point we ignore it. "This is what Democracy looks like!".
Well, Sparky, you obviously failed your civics classes. Our federal
government is not a democracy. We are a Republic. In fact, the US
Constitution explicitly mandates that every state of the union and those
seeking to join must demonstrate they have a republican form of
government, not a democracy.
However, the democratic
process our duly elected representatives to one portion of the bicameral
legislative branch of our great republic has spoken. After
deliberations, amendments to the order voted upon, with one approved,
the House Oversight Committee has decided to go forward with
contempt charges against Attorney General Eric Holder.
In earlier articles, I discussed Eric Holder's seeming
disregard (and contempt for) Federal Voter Laws,
such as the "Motor-Voter" Act of 1993 and the "HAVA" of 2002. He has
also shown disrespect for state sovereignty in establishing voter
integrity laws that support those federal laws, such as his suit against
Arizona' voter integrity law. Furthermore, he demonstrated contempt for
states who wish to bolster federal laws and assist in seeing them
enforced with laws such as Arizona's SB1070 and similar laws in Georgia
and Texas.
This order brings the vote to the general
assembly of the House of Representatives. It is not a "guilty" verdict.
It is more along the lines of a grand jury indictment. The charge of
contempt is not the same as other charges some seek against the AG in
regards to Operation Fast and Furious. It is more like a charge of
impeding an investigation.
The committee has requested
numerous documents in regards to the gun-walking operation. In addition,
they requested documents in regards to Operation Wide Receiver that was
conducted during the Bush administration. The majority of the documents
requested still have not been turned over.
Holder, feeling the heat, attempted to negotiate a
settlement on
the night of June 19, 2012. He promised a portion of the documents. He
showed up with none. He offered to give an oral summary. Given the
"inaccuracies" he was caught uttering while giving previous testimony,
the oral summary was out of the question.
The vote came
down mostly along partisan lines. Some of the Democrats may have
crossed the aisle had some of their proposed amendments passed the
committee vote. None did.
The real star of the hearing
was Representative Trey Gowdy of South Carolina. He presented perhaps the best
non-partisan arguments in the debate. Representative Gowdy demanded all the
documents from all gun-walking programs be brought forward. He stated that whoever the AG in charge was during the times of each should be
questioned, to include Eric Holder.
The Democrats who
attempted to defend Holder and oppose the order spoke mainly of
intentions behind Operation Fast and Furious as investigations into how
to reform gun sales in the United States. Translation, they claim it was
an investigation meant to look for more ways to violate our citizens'
Second Amendment rights.
That argument doesn't make any
sense. How does intentionally giving weapons to criminals and terrorists
who oppose our country supposed to bring reforms to how our citizens
defend themselves? It doesn't.
One congressman even
made a statement about AK-47 ownership in Arizona. He claimed that there
is no reason to own one. He stated that an AK-47, an M-4, or an AR-15
does not fulfill the need for hunting or self-defense. Obviously this individual needs to talk to the family of Robert Krentz, a rancher who was
assassinated by a drug cartel.
The criminals will get these weapons,
regardless of the laws. You cannot defend your family and property with a
pellet gun if those trespassing, invading, attacking and destroying
them are carrying PKMs. In addition, one lone rancher facing five to fifteen armed
men is outnumbered and out-gunned with just a shotgun or a .45cal
pistol. The US Supreme Court ruled that police do not have the
responsibility to protect individuals or their property. In addition,
the closest police station is up to an hour away on some southern
Arizona ranches.
Instead of looking for ways to prevent
guns that originate in the hands of lawful US gun dealers from ending up in
the hands of foreign criminals, they should have looked into ways to
track those already in their hands. They made a mistake. They used no
methods to track the weapons. Such tracking methods do exist and are
effective. We have employed them in similar operations in other countries.
However, this time were not employed. The weapons went, unaccounted for, to
terrorists and criminals. The end result was the murders of over three hundred
Mexican citizens, and at least one US Border Patrol Agent we know of, so
far, Brian Terry.
The backpedaling involved an
ulterior motive in recording how complicit the weapons dealers were in
supplying the cartels. The issue with that claim is that the weapons'
dealers agreed to assist the ATF and DoJ in this operation out of a
sense of patriotism. They weren't caught breaking the law. They were
asked to help the DoJ and ATF break the law. As the son of a former
licensed gun dealer, I know the value in cooperating with the ATF when
they ask for help. It can make necessary audits remain thorough but a
lot less unpleasant.
The executive response to the
hearing was to send some aid from the AG's office with a notice that
Obama indicated he may seek executive privilege on the documents. The
truth, even with that memorandum, is no such privilege had been invoked.
Holder was in violation of the summons at the time the hearing took
place. The alleged crime had already been committed.
The
formal contempt vote is set to take place some time next week. Today,
however, the contempt order (bill) on Holder
passed with a vote of
23-17.
Still, Holder tries to obfuscate and stall investigations. In
response, Holder made a statement that he handed over more than 7,600 documents already. Many of these were redacted to the extent that they
no longer contained no information. It was also just a small portion of the
documents requested. Unverified rumors also indicate that Obama
will, in fact, invoke "executive privilege" in order to protect AG Holder.
This makes me want to review the case of
US v Nixon.
This is what contempt for our US Constitution looks like. It looks like Eric Holder.